(PS) Johnson v. Solano County Sheriff,.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20232:22-cv-02061California525 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES L. JOHNSON, JR., No. 2:22-cv-02061-DAD-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER RELATING AND

CONSOLIDATING CASES

SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al.,

Defendants.

16 No. 2:22-cv-02220-KJM-JDP (PC)

JAMES L. JOHNSON, JR.,

18 Plaintiff, 19 v. 20 CYNTHIA HILL, et al., 21 Defendants. 22 Plaintiff James L. Johnson, Jr. is proceeding pro se in the above-captioned actions, alleging that defendants deprived him of his civil rights. An examination of the above-captioned actions reveals that they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a). Accordingly, assignment of the above-captioned actions to the same district judge and magistrate judge will promote substantial efficiency and economy for the court and is likely to be convenient for the parties. Moreover, pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[i]f actions before the court involve a common question of law or fact, the court may: (1) join for hearing or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.