Lawrence

Lawrence v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20231:22-cv-00931California450 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUSAN LAWRENCE, Case No. 1:22-cv-00931-ADA-EPG Plaintiffs, v. ORDER APPROVING, IN PART,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,

Defendant. (ECF No. 23)

15 16 On July 20, 2023, the parties filed a stipulated protective order for the Court’s approval.1 17 (ECF No. 23). Upon review, the Court finds it acceptable in most respects. However, the Court 18 notes that the parties define the term “confidential information or items” to mean “information 19 (regardless of how generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection 20 under California Law.” (Id. at 2) (alterations to capitalization and punctuation). Such a definition 21 improperly allows the parties to deem information confidential so long as they themselves believe 22 that it qualifies for protection under California law and without ever disclosing the types of information at issue as required by Local Rule 141(c)(1). However, the parties elsewhere provide of description of certain “types” of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.