Kuersten

(PC) Priest v. Kuersten

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20232:21-cv-00058California856 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID PRIEST, No. 2: 21-cv-0058 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER BENTLEY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, for appointment of counsel and for an extension of time. (ECF No. 94.) Motion for Reconsideration/Extension of Time On March 9, 2023, the undersigned recommended that defendants’ supplemental summary judgment motion be granted. (ECF No. 83.) On March 29, 2023, the undersigned granted plaintiff’s request for a thirty days extension of time to file objections to the March 9, 2023 findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 89.) On April 26, 2023, plaintiff filed a motion to stay this action due to medical issues. (ECF No. 91.) On May 25, 2023, the undersigned denied this motion because it was not signed by plaintiff as required…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.