Anderson

Anderson v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20232:18-cv-00714California2,021 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD ANDERSON, RAYMOND No. 2:18-cv-00714 DJC AC KEITH CORUM, and JESSE AND COLLEEN WORTHINGTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER Plaintiffs, v. EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P., Defendant. 18 This matter is before the court defendant’s motion to strike plaintiffs’ late-filed initial disclosures. ECF No. 130. This motion was heard on shortened time considering the upcoming deadline for the parties to disclose expert witnesses. ECF Nos. 131, 132, 135. The matter was heard on July 19, 2023. ECF Nos. 130, 132. For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. Relevant Background This case was filed on March 30, 2018. ECF No. 1. Plaintiffs are pursuing a putative class-action lawsuit limited to a single claim for alleged breach of fiduciary duty by defendant Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. (“EDJ”) financial advisors (“FAs”) with respect to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.