Warden
(HC) Hinojosa v. Warden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT GEORGE HINOJOSA, No. 2:22-cv-01780 KJM DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN, SATF/SP, Respondent. 16 A petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 was filed, it appears, on behalf of petitioner, Robert Hinojosa, by a fellow inmate, who identifies himself as Joshua Davis Bland. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 10, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 8.) Mr. Bland has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 9.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court…