(PS) McCray v. City of American Canyon City Hall

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 24, 20232:22-cv-01684California314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMILAH MONIQUE MCCRAY, No. 2:22-cv-01684-DJC-KJN (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON CITY

HALL,

15 Defendant.

17 On May 30, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Although it appears from the file that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, Plaintiff was properly served. It is the Plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.