Neuschmid

(HC) Sisounthone v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 24, 20232:18-cv-03181California1,569 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VANNA SISOUNTHONE, No. 2:18-cv-03181-DAD-AC (PC) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

v. RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS IN

PART

ROBERT NEUSHCMID, Warden, (Doc. Nos. 10, 25, 26) Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 17 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On April 26, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 20 recommending that respondent’s motion to dismiss the pending petition as presenting only 21 unexhausted claims be granted as to Claims One, Three and Four and denied as to petitioner’s 22 Claim Two. (Doc. No. 26.) The findings and recommendations were served on petitioner with 23 notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of their 24 service. Petitioner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.