(PC) Rojas v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20232:22-cv-01748California501 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT EUGENE ROJAS, No. 2:22-cv-01748 KJM CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 3, 2023, the magistrate judge directed plaintiff to notify the court within 21 days whether he wants to proceed on three of the claims identified in that order or file a second amended complaint to cure the deficiencies in the amended complaint. Order (Mar. 3, 2023), ECF No. 9. The magistrate judge advised plaintiff that the action would proceed on the three claims if he did not return the required form. Id. Plaintiff did not respond to the court’s order. On April 7, 2023, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending the action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.