Perdroza

(PC) Cunningham v. Perdroza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20231:23-cv-00041California1,074 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

L.C. CUNNINGHAM, Case No. 1:23-cv-00041-ADA-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO

EXCHANGE DOCUMENTS

v.

J. PERDROZA, et al., Defendant(s). 14 L.C. Cunningham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. All claims and Defendants have been dismissed, except for Plaintiff’s failure-to-protect claims against Defendants J. Perdroza, S. Sovoie, and D. Mendez based on Plaintiff’s allegations that these Defendants labeled him a “snitch.”1 (ECF No. 24, p. 2). On June 22, 2023, the Court issued an order requiring the parties to file scheduling and discovery statements. (ECF No. 29). The parties have now filed their statements. (ECF Nos. 30, 31). The Court has reviewed this case and the parties’ statements. In an effort to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of this action,2 the Court will direct that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.