Block
Block v. California-Fresno Investment Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 1:22-cv-01419-JLT-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO TERMINATE CEDAR PLAZA, INC. AS
v. DEFENDANT IN THIS ACTION
CALIFORNIA-FRESNO INVESTMENT (ECF No. 21)
COMPANY,
13 Defendant. 14 On July 24, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) as to the dismissal of Defendant Cedar Plaza, Inc. (ECF No. 21.) The dismissal of this Defendant is without prejudice. (Id. at 1.) The claims against the other named Defendant are not subject to the stipulation and will remain active. Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”)); Hells…