Schmuckley

Schmuckley v. Rite Aid Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20232:12-cv-01699California855 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ERIC W. SITARCHUK, Admitted pro hac vice eric.sitarchuk@morganlewis.com KELLY A. MOORE, Admitted pro hac vice kelly.moore@morganlewis.com BENJAMIN P. SMITH, Bar No. 197551 benjamin.smith@morganlewis.com KEVIN M. PAPAY, Bar No. 274161 kevin.papay@morganlewis.com One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105-1596 Tel: +1.415.442.1000 Fax: +1.415.442.1001

Attorneys for Defendants

RITE AID CORPORATION, RITE AID HDQTRS.

CORP, AND THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC.

(Additional counsel listed on signature page) 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the Case No.: 2:12-cv-1699 KJM JDP STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ex rel. LLOYD

F. SCHMUCKLEY, JR. JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND

SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER

Plaintiffs,

vs.

RITE AID CORPORATION, RITE AID

HDQTRS. CORP., THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC. Defendants. 21 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. LLOYD F.

SCHMUCKLEY, JR.,

Plaintiffs,

Vs.

RITE AID CORPORATION, RITE AID

HDQTRS. CORP., THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC.

26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.