CDCR

(PC) Hamilton v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20232:23-cv-00347California268 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALBERT JOHN HAMILTON, No. 2: 23-cv-00347 DJC KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. 16 By order filed June 6, 2023, the undersigned granted plaintiff forty-five days to either obtain counsel to represent him in this action or to file an amended complaint. Forty-five days from that date have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.