Owen

Owen v. Hyundai Motor America

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20232:22-cv-00882California1,048 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 Dayna Owen, No. 2:22-cv-00882-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. Hyundai Motor America, et al., IS Defendants. 14 Plaintiff Dayna Owen moves to modify deadlines in the pretrial scheduling order. See 16 generally Mot., ECF No. 39. Defendant Hyundai Motor America opposes the motion, which is 17 now fully briefed, see generally Opp’n, ECF No. 46; Reply, ECF No. 49. The court submitted 18 the motion without hearing oral arguments. ECF No. 48. As explained in this order, the motion 19 is granted. Owen alleges she bought a defective Hyundai Elantra in 2016. Compl. ff 8, 13, ECF No.1. She filed this action in May 2022, asserting a variety of claims under state and federal 22 laws that can offer remedies for consumers who buy defective products. See generally id. Hyundai answered the complaint, ECF No. 6, and the court issued a pretrial scheduling order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.