Napear

Napear v. Bonneville Internat'l Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20232:21-cv-01956California9,816 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRANT NAPEAR, No. 2:21-cv-01956-DAD-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER

BONNEVILLE INTERNATIONAL AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

CORPORATION, IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

DISMISS Defendant. (Doc. Nos. 52, 56) 17 18 This matter came before the court on July 18, 2023 for a hearing on plaintiff’s motion to modify the governing scheduling order and for leave to file a third amended complaint and defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. Nos. 52, 56.) Attorney Matthew Ruggles appeared by video for plaintiff. Attorneys Tanner Camp and David Jordan appeared by video on behalf of defendant. For the reasons explained below, plaintiff’s motion to modify the scheduling order and for leave to file a third amended complaint will be denied and defendant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.