Torres

(PC) Barrios v. Torres

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20231:20-cv-01234California604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANKLIN BARRIOS, Case No. 1:20-cv-01234-ADA-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY

COURT ORDERS

TORRES, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 Franklin Barrios is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 29, 2023, Defendants Diaz and Torres filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 33.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non-opposition was to be filed “not more than twenty-one (21) days after the date of service of the motion.” Defendants’ motion papers served on Plaintiff advised him of this requirement. (Id. at 2.) More than 21 days have passed; however Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion. Finally, the Court notes Plaintiff has not sought an extension of time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.