Flores
(PC) Evans v. Flores
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMAL EVANS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00170-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
DISMISS CASE1
R. FLORES, JOSTRUNDEA, AND R.
GODWIN, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 10)
17 Pending before the Court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A is Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 10, “FAC”). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that the district court dismiss the First Amended Complaint because it fails to state any cognizable constitutional claim and any future attempts to amend appear futile. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Plaintiff commenced this action while in prison and is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), which requires, inter alia, the court to screen any complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, its officers, or its employees before…