Tucker

facts which are necessary to fully understand what occurred during the incident giving rise to this 25 lawsuit. Thus, in addition to deriving the facts from the undisputed facts as stated by defendants and responded to by plaintiff (Doc. No. 22-1 at 2–11 (“DUF”)) and the undisputed and disputed 26 facts as stated by plaintiff and responded to by defendants (id. at 11–19 (“PUDF”)), the court provides the following factual background based on the exhibits filed in support of defendants’ motion for summary judgment and plaintiff’s opposition thereto. (Doc. Nos. 13-2, 13-3, 13-4, 13- 5, 13-6, 13-7, 13-8, 13-9, 13-10, 13-11, 13-12, 17-2). order to provide backup to defendant Abedrabbo because the anonymous caller had reported seeing the suspect with a weapon. (Id.) Many of the events that occurred during the incident were captured to some extent on defendant Abedrabbo’s body-worn camera (Doc. No. 13-4, “VA”), defendant Miller’s body-worn camera (Doc. No. 13-5, “VM”), and the in-car camera recording from defendant Miller’s vehicle (Doc. No. 13-6, “VC”). Defendant Abedrabbo’s body-worn camera recorded his interaction with plaintiff, with audio,…