Peery

(HC) Ward v. Peery

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 20232:21-cv-02220California822 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH VINCENT WARD, No. 2:21-cv-2220-DAD-KJN (HC) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

v. PETITIONER’S MOTIONS FOR A STAY

AND FOR DISCOVERY

SUZANNE M. PEERY, (Doc. Nos. 19, 20, 24) Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 1, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that petitioner’s motion for stay and abeyance (Doc. No. 19) and his motion to compel discovery (Doc. No. 20) be denied. (Doc. No. 24.) The findings and recommendations were served on petitioner with notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of their service. Petitioner’s objections to the pending findings and 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.