(PC) Ramos v. California Dept of Corrections

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE RAMOS, No. 2:22-cv-00004 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 By order filed June 13, 2023, a recommendation to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint was vacated and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). //// These…