Richards
Richards v. City of Citrus Heights
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SANDRA RICHARDS, No. 2:20-cv-02159-DAD-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS, IN PART, AND
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, et al., DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR A
MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
Defendants. (Doc. No. 31)
17 This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss certain of plaintiff’s claims pursuant to Federal Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6), or in the alternative, for a more definite statement pursuant to Federal Civil Procedure Rule 12(e). (Doc. No. 31.) On March 14, 2023, defendants’ motion was taken under submission on the papers. (Doc. No. 35.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant defendants’ motion to dismiss, in part, and deny defendants’ motion for a more definite statement. BACKGROUND In her operative third amended complaint (“TAC”), plaintiff alleges as follows. Plaintiff is a 59-year-old woman who was employed as a…