Redman

(PC) Lyle v. Redman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20232:22-cv-01801California333 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL WILLIAM LYLE, JR., No. 2:22-cv-01801 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GARY REDMON, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed June 6, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. It further appears based on the notice from the Amador County Sheriff’s Office that plaintiff is no longer located at the address of record. Although it appears plaintiff is no longer located at the address of record, plaintiff is properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.