Strancener

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN MARK VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:23-cv-0278 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER WARREN C. STRANCENER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former1 county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint is before the court for screening. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will direct plaintiff to submit an in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application and dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed IFP concurrently with the complaint. (ECF No. 2.) However, he did not submit his IFP request on the proper form. Additionally, as previously stated, it appears that plaintiff has been released from custody. If plaintiff still wishes to proceed IFP, he must submit an updated application under § 1915(a)(1). See DeBlasio v. Gilmore, 315 26 1 At the time plaintiff filed the complaint he was in the custody…