Hicks
(PC) Braley v. Hicks
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS D. BRALEY, No. 1:23-cv-00206-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER CONSTRUING PLAINTIFF’S
DECLARATION AS MOTION FOR
v. RECONSIDERATION AND DENYING
MOTION
R. HICKS, et al., (Doc. 20) Defendants.
16 The assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations, recommending that, “[p]ursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), Plaintiff not be allowed proceed in forma pauperis in this action,” and that Plaintiff “be directed to pay the $402.00 filing fee in full if he wants to proceed with this action.” (Doc. 3 at 2.) After receiving three extensions of time, Plaintiff filed objections on June 5, 2023. (Doc. 17.) The Court adopted the findings and recommendations in full, denying Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee within thirty days. (Doc. 19.) A month later, Plaintiff filed a “declaration” in which he claims that he has met the imminent danger standard to…