(PS) Decker v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20232:22-cv-00258California442 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW DECKER, No. 2:22-CV-0258-DAD-DMC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SHANNAH JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s original complaint, ECF No. 1. The Court previously determined that Plaintiff’s complaint stated claims for relief against Defendants Ruiz and Johnson based on excessive force. See ECF No. 6. The Court also concluded that Plaintiff’s action could not proceed as against any other named defendant on any other claim. See id. To provide Plaintiff the fullest opportunity to explain his claims, Plaintiff was provided leave to amend. See id. Plaintiff was informed that, if he did not file an amended complaint within the time provided, the Court would direct that the action proceed as against Defendants Ruiz and Johnson only as to Plaintiff’s excessive force claims. See id. / /…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.