Santero

(HC) McKinney v. Santero

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20232:23-cv-00416California648 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHANIEL McKINNEY, No. 2:23-cv-00416 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

KELLY SANTORO, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The first amended petition filed on July 17, 2023 (ECF No. 9), is before the court for screening. The exhaustion of state court remedies is a prerequisite to the granting of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1). If exhaustion is to be waived, it must be waived explicitly by respondent’s counsel. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(3).1 A waiver of exhaustion may not be implied or inferred. A petitioner satisfies the exhaustion requirement by providing the highest state court with a full and fair opportunity to consider all claims before presenting them to the federal court. Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270, 276 (1971); Middleton v. Cupp, 768…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.