Albrecht

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ATHELSTAN A. WRIGHT, Case No. 2:23-cv-00453-DJC-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. A. ALBRECHT, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff brings this section 1983 case against defendants alleging various violations of his constitutional rights. After screening his second amended complaint, I find that his Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical need claims against defendants Albrecht, Jodin, and Murpy are viable to proceed. His other claims, for the reasons stated below, are not. Plaintiff may either proceed only with his viable claims, or he may delay serving any defendant and file another amended complaint.

28 1 Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any…