Curry

(PC) Hayes-Kelly v. Curry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20232:23-cv-00585California399 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICHOLAS K. HAYES-KELLY, No. 2:23-cv-00585-DAD-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CLINTON J. CURRY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On June 9, 2023, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 11. The court dismissed the complaint, explained the deficiencies therein, and granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. Id. The screening order warned plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. The time for filing an amended complaint has passed and plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the court’s order. Thus, it appears that plaintiff is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.