Son

(PC) Hamilton v. Son

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20232:19-cv-02210California926 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID HAMILTON, No. 2:19-cv-02210-DAD-AC (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

M. SON, (Doc. Nos. 33, 42) Defendant.

16 Plaintiff David Hamilton is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 29, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 33) be granted. (Doc. No. 42.) Specifically, the magistrate judge recommended that defendant should be granted summary judgment with respect to plaintiff’s claim that defendant Son exhibited deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs by discontinuing his pain medication without prescribing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.