Peery

(HC) Abuanbar v. Peery

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20232:21-cv-00347California463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY LEWIS ABUANBAR, Case No. 2:21-cv-00347-KJM-JDP (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER S. PEERY, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 15, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections. Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned as undeliverable, petitioner was properly served. It is petitioner’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Under Local Rule 182(f), service of 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.