Zarate

Zarate v. Monsanto Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20232:23-cv-00991California364 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Nee tet er ee ee ON eee OO a Ee Oe WON Of ee oe ee □ “aS _/_ Wi

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL FILED

on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION no 2028

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —409)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 214 F.Supp.3d 1346 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 3,866 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.