Block

Block v. California-Fresno Investment Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20231:22-cv-01419California381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 1:22-cv-01419-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING AUGUST 24, 2023

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND

v. REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

CALIFORNIA-FRESNO INVESTMENT

COMPANY, THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

15 Defendant. 16 On June 30, 2023, the Clerk of the Court entered default against the only remaining Defendant in this action, pursuant to Plaintiff’s request. (ECF Nos. 19, 20.) Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two- step process. Yue v. Storage Technology Corp., No. 3:07-cv-05850, 2008 WL 361142, *2 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2008). Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). After entry of default, the plaintiff can seek…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.