Diaz

(PC) Miller v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20231:20-cv-01243California1,319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS MILLER, Case No. 1:20-cv-1243-ADA-HBK (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY

FILING FEE OR FILE UPDATED

v. FINANCIAL INFORMATION B. CATES, FAYE MONTEGRANDE, AUGUST 31, 2023 DEADLINE

OLUFEMI OWOLABI, U. BANGIA,

15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Curtis Miller, who is proceeding pro se, has filed a notice of change of address reflecting that he has been released from detention. (See Doc. No. 19). Because Plaintiff initiated this action while a prisoner and was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (Doc. No. 5), he is “required to pay the full amount of a filing fee” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”). 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Based on Plaintiff’s 24 1 The Court independently has confirmed that Plaintiff, who was formerly identified as Curtis Miller Inmate No. H40805, is no longer in California correctional Institution’s custody. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.