Sanders

Sanders v. Sutter Health Sac. Region

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 1, 20232:23-cv-00589California4,630 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

THE VELEZ LAW FIRM, P.C.

MARK P. VELEZ (SBN 163484)

NATALYA V. GRUNWALD (SBN 265084) 3010 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 180 Roseville, CA 95661 Telephone: (916) 774-2720 Facsimile: (916) 774-2730 E-mail: velezlaw@live.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff KYONA SANDERS

HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

JAHMAL T. DAVIS, SBN 191504

jdavis@hansonbridgett.com

WARREN HODGES, SBN 287162

whodges@hansonbridgett.com 425 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 Facsimile: (415) 541-9366 Attorneys for Defendant

SUTTER VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION

13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 KYONA SANDERS, No. 2:23-cv-0589 TLN DB

Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

v.

SUTTER VALLEY MEDICAL

FOUNDATION,

21 Defendant.

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS. Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.