Burlingham

(PS) Young v. Burlingham

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 1, 20232:22-cv-01712California2,361 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL CHRISTOPHER YOUNG, Case No. 2:22-cv-01712-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STEVEN RICHARD BURLINGHAM, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel, commenced this action against Steven Richard Burlingham, “temporary/judge (attorney)”; David Louis Brown, Jr., attorney; Gregory Ralph Beyer, attorney; and Jennifer Schreiber, paralegal. ECF No. 4 at 2-3. Plaintiff is no stranger to this court, having now filed five cases against the same defendants, dealing primarily with the issues raised in this case. See Young v. Burlingham, 2:21-cv-00537-TLN-KJN, Young v. Burlingham, 2:21-cv-1660-KJM-AC, Young v. Burlingham, 2:22-cv-00053-TLN-CKD, Young v. Burlingham, 2:22-cv-00590-JAM-CKD. Pending before the court is Burlingham’s motion to dismiss. I recommend granting Burlingham’s motion and dismissing the complaint without leave to amend. 27 1 The remaining defendants have not appeared, and it does not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.