(PC) Campbell v. Bell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 1, 20232:23-cv-00815California350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCUS DANTEL CAMPBELL, No. 2:23-cv-0815 AC P Plaintiff,

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS A. BELL, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed May 8, 2023, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis application and a certified copy of his jail trust account statement and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 4. After plaintiff failed to file a completed application or pay the fee, he was given an additional twenty- one days to comply and warned that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further warning. ECF No. 5. The twenty-one-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, paid the filing fee, or otherwise responded to the court’s orders. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.