Holguin

(PC) McCoy v. Holguin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20231:15-cv-00768California6,510 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAKEITH MCCOY, Case No. 1:15-cv-00768-ADA-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DENY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT1

A. HOLGUIN, et al., FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendants. (Doc. No. 194) 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendants G. Arellano, E. Barron, O. Delgado, S. Lomas, Mayfield, Montanez, V. Moore, and Moreno’s motion for summary judgment with supporting documents. (Doc. No. 194 through 194-14, “MSJ”). Plaintiff filed an Opposition, (Doc. No. 212), and Defendants filed a Reply. (Doc. No. 213). For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends the district court deny Defendants’ MSJ. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff LaKeith McCoy (“Plaintiff” or “McCoy”), a former state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1) Plaintiff is proceeding

1 This matter was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.