Marroquin
(PC) Brown v. Marroquin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BOBBY E. BROWN, 1:21-cv-00087-ADA-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS’
vs. ANSWER
MARROQUIN, et al., (ECF No. 34.) Defendants. 16 Bobby E. Brown (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with the original Complaint filed on January 21, 2021, against defendants Darius Campbell, D. Chavez, M. Espinosa, Otto Marroquin, and M. Pompa (collectively “Defendants”), on Plaintiff’s claims for excessive force. (ECF No. 1.) On June 5, 2023, Defendants filed an Answer to the Complaint. (ECF No. 23.) On June 26, 2023, Plaintiff filed objections to Defendants’ Answer. (ECF No. 26.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7(a) identifies the types of pleadings which are allowed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a). Parties are only permitted to file a reply to an Answer “if the court orders one.” …