Dahl

(PC) Adams v. Dahl

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20231:20-cv-00852California1,366 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL ADAMS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00852-JLT-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO VACATE DISCOVERY AND

v. SCHEDULING ORDER AND STAYING

CASE

DAHL, et al.,

(Docs. 58) Defendants. ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

RESPONSE TO MOTION TO COMPEL

(Doc. 57)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

20 Plaintiff Paul Adams is a parolee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on First and Eighth Amendment claims raised against Defendants Dahl, Rios, and Kendrick in Plaintiff’s first amended complaint. (See Docs. 7, 10, 11.) I. BACKGROUND On February 23, 2023, the Court entered a discovery and scheduling order setting the exhaustion motion deadline for June 23, 2023. (Doc. 53.) The Court ordered the parties to by Defendants, the Court modified the discovery and scheduling order and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.