(PC) Rojas v. Sacramento County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20232:22-cv-00379California475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT EUGENE ROJAS, No. 2:22-CV-0379-DJC-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s original complaint, ECF No. 1. The Court previously determined that Plaintiff’s complaint stated various cognizable claims for relief against the County of Sacramento and named subsidiary entities. See ECF No. 12. The Court also concluded that Plaintiff’s action could not proceed as against the Sacramento County Superior Court because it is immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. See id. It was unclear to the Court whether Plaintiff intended to proceed against any individuals whom he claims were responsible for alleged constitutional violations. See id. To provide Plaintiff the fullest opportunity to explain his claim,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.