(HC) Randall v. RJ Donovan Correctional Facility
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VIRGIL DOUGLAS RANDALL, No. 2:23-cv-1480 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER RICHARD J. DONOVAN
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,
15 Respondent.
17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a document that appears to be seeking release from prison, which this court construes as an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner is provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee. ////
Although petitioner refers to Judge Delaney, petitioner did not provide a case number. If petitioner is referring to Randall v. Sacramento State Prison, Folsom, No. 17-0929 CKD P, such 26 case was terminated on April 8, 2019. Id. A court may take judicial notice of court records. …