(PC) Gray v. C. Flores

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20231:20-cv-00902California521 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OLIVER GRAY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00902-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER NOTING VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL UNDER FED. R. CIV. P.

v. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS

AND CLAIMS

C. FLORES, M. FRANCO, L. LANE,

AND Q. TRUE, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REVISE

DOCKET TO REFLECT ONLY NAMED Defendants. DEFENDANT 16 (Doc. No. 26)

18 Plaintiff Oliver Gray, a prisoner, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 3, 2023, this Court issued a screening order on Plaintiff’s Complaint. (Doc. No. 21). As discussed at length in this Court’s screening order, the Complaint states a cognizable Eighth Amendment sexual assault claim against Defendant Flores but no other claim. (Id. at 9-11). Specifically, the Court found the Complaint did not state any cognizable claim against Defendants Franco, Lane, or True. (Id.). The Screening Order afforded…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.