Gipson

(PC) Armenta v. Gipson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20232:22-cv-00737California1,524 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD ARMENTA, No. 2:22-cv-00737-WBS-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CONNIE GIPSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. This case proceeds on plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 16) against defendants Connie Gipson, Johnson, Castaneda, Casillas, Soto, Trenda, Garcia, Oakes, Hicks, Kiebler, Hall, Peery, and Benavidez (ECF No. 18). This order and findings and recommendations address several miscellaneous motions now pending before the court, including: (1) defendants’ Motion to Revoke Plaintiff’s In Forma Pauperis Status (ECF No. 37); (2) plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 46); (3) plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (ECF No. 47), (4) plaintiff’s Motion to file a Supplemental Pleading (ECF No. 53) (5) plaintiff’s Motion for Service (ECF No. 35), and (6) plaintiff’s Motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.