Alo

Alo v. Ramos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20231:23-cv-00663California313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALCAPONE ALO, Case No. 1:23-cv-00663-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Docs. 1, 4) ASHLEY RAMOS,

Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff Alcapone Alo (“Plaintiff”), a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 1, 2023. (Doc. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302. On June 29, 2023, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 4.) Plaintiff was granted twenty-one days in which to file objections to the findings and recommendations. The deadline to file objections has passed and no objections have been filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Britt…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.