Brown

(PC) Peets v. Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20232:18-cv-02469California775 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LOUIS PEETS, No. 2:18-CV-2469-DJC-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER RICHARD TOWNSEND, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s unopposed motion for terminating sanctions, ECF No. 92. On January 9, 2023, the Court granted Defendant’s unopposed motion to compel discovery responses from Plaintiff. See ECF No. 86. Plaintiff was ordered to service responses to Defendant’s interrogatories and requests for production of documents within 30 days of the date of the Court’s order. See id. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply could result in terminating sanctions on Defendant’s motion. See id. According to Defendant, as of March 2, 2023, Plaintiff had not complied. See ECF No. 92. Defendant then filed the currently pending motion for terminating sanctions. See id. To date, Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.