(PC) Cage v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20231:22-cv-01429California714 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIM CAGE, Case No.: 1:22-cv-01429-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO RENAME

DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 11 AND TO

v. RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

A. JOHNSON, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

Defendants. DEFENDANTS

14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

17 Plaintiff Jim Cage is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On April 26, 2023, this Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 10.) The Court found Plaintiff stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendant Rojas, but his complaint failed to state any other cognizable claim against any other named defendant. (Id. at 3-8.) As a result, within 21 days of service of the screening order, Plaintiff was to elect one of the following three options: (1) to notify…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.