Clendenin

(PC) Neill v. Clendenin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20231:23-cv-00901California3,004 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 PATRICK NEILL, No. 1:23-cv-00901-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE

CLAIM FOR RELIEF

13 (ECF No. 1)

15 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 16 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed June 15, 2023. 18 I.

SCREENING REQUIREMENT

20 As Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4), the Court screens the complaint 21 under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. “Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have 22 been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that the action or 23 appeal fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 24 A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.