(PC)Taylor-El

(PC)Taylor-El v. Cisneros

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20231:23-cv-00889California1,528 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOE ALFRED TAYLOR-EL, III No. 1:23-cv-00889-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION T. CISNEROS, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

Defendants. REMAND (ECF No. 4) 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand, filed July 26, 2023. I. BACKGROUND On June 12, 2023, Defendants removed this action from the Kings County Superior Court pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1441, and 1446, contending the complaint alleges causes of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of the Eighth among other claims, and that this Court therefore has federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1441. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.