Leahy

(PC) King v. Leahy

Caution
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20231:23-cv-00823California2,668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAUL KING, No. 1:23-cv-00823-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION J. LEAHY, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE

Defendant. ACTION (ECF No. 9) 13 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on May 26, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) On June 1, 2023, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the June 1, 2023 order. Therefore, on July 11, 2023, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.