(PC) Duncan v. California Healthcare Receivership Corp.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIONTAE JOHAN DUNCAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-01288-ADA-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFENDANTS GRAYWALL AND
v. GERDERAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FROM THIS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO
CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE PROVIDE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION RECEIVERSHIP CORP., et al., TO EFFECT SERVICE 15 Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE
18 Plaintiff Diontae Johan Duncan is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action proceeds on Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Marciel, Graywall, Taylor, Gerderal and Jane Does #1 and #2, as alleged in Plaintiff’s second amended complaint. I. BACKGROUND Following screening, this Court issued its Order Finding Service Appropriate on June 6, 2023. (Doc. 81.) Service of Defendants Marciel, Graywall, Taylor, and Gerderal was to be effected…