Perez

Perez v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20232:21-cv-00356California3,105 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMBERLY PEREZ, et al., No. 2:21-cv-00356-TLN-JDP Plaintiffs, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendant County of Sacramento’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 25.) Plaintiff Kimberly Perez (“Perez”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 31.) Plaintiffs Maurice Holley, Jr., Mitra Holley, and Angel Holley (collectively, “Holley Plaintiffs”) filed a statement of non-opposition. (ECF No. 29.) Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 33.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 On October 6, 2019, at approximately 2:15 p.m., the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office received a call for service regarding a suspicious subject, later identified as Maurice Holley (“Holley”). (ECF No. 31-1 at ¶ 1.) The caller reported that Holley was known to carry knives 5 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.